useful design's picture

Composition Loader apps have the name in Finder Dock

Although we have the window title of composition run/view windows set to the files name automatically, they all appear as "VuoCompositionLoader" and I can't remember which one is which because Dock always juggles things around.

Be good to have the app process name changed to file name, or even just VuoCompLoader1, VuoCompLoader2,… if that is less work. It's a minor request but would help. I tend to have several compositions running to help me understand how a particular node or combination of nodes works when I'm working on a bigger composition.

I use ⌘⇧R to achieve this ATM, but involves a time wait and reset state penalty.

Screenshots, Mockups, and Videos: 

useful design's picture

Detached Port Popovers with enhanced behavioral attributes

As I'm learning Vuo still, popovers are one of my favourite debugging and WTFing tools in Vuo. I'd just like them to behave a bit more orderly.

I'd like detached popovers to

  1. Maintain minimum size unless size has been adjust (currently we cannot adjust their window size)
  2. Be size adjustable to see more data at times (less important)
  3. When opened, moved, closed, opened again: return to the previous (user preferred) moved position at least until I quit Vuo.

I arrange a series of popovers on the screen and they are watching lists, and i've deliberately made the lists short so I can see what is going on through the composition as I adjust an input value. Then I make the lists quite long (maybe by accident maybe intentionally) and either way when I return to short lists, the windows don't shrink to small windows again and they're all on top of each other. If I close popover tear offs, when I reopen them I need to reposition them.

I realise they stay at the bigger size possibly to stop them constantly adjusting size and slowing the editor down, so perhaps a one second delay could occur before returning to a minimally appropriate size?

Original minimal size:

Bigger lists they expand:

left behind:

Sorry don't know what is going on with those tiny thumb images when you click the links. I uploaded screenshots, what happened after that i dont know :-)

Screenshots, Mockups, and Videos: 

useful design's picture

This would be good for debugging/newbie learning the more complex data types in Vuo. If I could see the contents of Make 3D… nodes and Mesh nodes I think it would help me to learn Vuo more quickly.

Also allow hack editing of values if they can convert back to original data-type.

I really like this concept, I thought data-types in Vuo would be a bit more transparent than I find them.

useful design's picture

Alternative suggestion is a Right-Click menu item for "Connect Shared Value Node…" (equivalent in QC was the "Insert Input Splitter…" and Kineme's "Insert Input Splitters to All Ports…").

I used these all the time to copy non-trivial values that could be stored in a slitter. Sometimes they are detachable and store the value internally, sometimes not.

I'd like that feature in Vuo too, even if there's less call for this hack in Vuo.

useful design's picture

Would be good :-)

Would developers get to override some input views, say for integers to set upper and lower bounds based on some other inputs on the Node, or a constant in the node code itself?

useful design's picture

90º: Ok will check again, I missed it!

I suppose if any of us know C well, we could read Smokris' Reinterpret 3D Object source code. (Mine is extremely rudimentary so I'm not game) And we would have the base code for a 3D Polygon from Points node! It must be most of the way there, surely? It does the filling for us. Polygon Node FR is listed as 2 out of 3 for complexity "a few weeks of work". Maybe a rework of the smokris code could be a stopgap for the next release? It's just about juggling those points the way @Bodysoulspirit did and combining that with a sub-set of the `Reinterpret 3D Object' code, am I right Jaymie (@jstrecker)?

The bells and whistles of proper 2D polygon corner mitres/radiusing and treatment of compound paths (like the letter "O" or "A" or a circle inside a circle for negative space) could come with an upgrade to the Polygon patch if people started using it and wanting more finesse.

jstrecker's picture
@jstrecker commented on @kokot's Discussion, “Do image dimensions matter?

It really depends on your hardware and what all processing of the image is being done in Vuo and VDMX. In some situations, it's true that images with power-of-two dimensions are processed faster. I would recommend making a comparison on your own system — load different versions of a Vuo composition in VDMX, one using 16:9 images and the other using power-of-two images — and see if you notice a difference.

Bodysoulspirit's picture

Alastair (@usefuldesign) glad it already helps a bit.
Yes there is a 90° rotation on the Make 3D Object node.

Maybe using Smokris Reinterpret node there could be an even easier way to achieve this.
It was just a quick test and since I don't know anything about the whole openGL vertices triangles thing I have to play around ;)

Yes I see what you mean with giving points that would close and create a shape. Thinking almost vector design here. Maybe also linked to Feature Request SVG & PDF import



Vuo is more than nodes and cables, it's a community! Feel free to browse or add your voice.

Browse Discussions

Start a Discussion

Browse Feature Requests

Suggest a Feature

Browse the Composition Gallery

Share a Composition

How can I get notifications?

Learn more about the community

Learn more about Vuo

Vuo Announcements

Sign up for the Vuo announcements mailing list to get news and join the community. We post about once per month.